AUSTIN, Texas — “Inquiry-based shared inquiry across cognitive and affective domains.” “An experiential based learning process covering multiple modalities.” “Terminal and enabling objectives with trans-disciplinary functionalities.” “Stackable credentials in the education space.”
Educators, policymakers and entrepreneurs often speak in the multisyllabic jargon of a doctoral thesis. And it diminishes their message.
How can they translate that complexity for the wider audience of investors, clients, politicians, taxpayers, journalists and the rest of us who, after all, are being asked to understand, adopt, and pay for the ideas they pitch?
A new movement is trying to help clear education’s arteries of the edu-speak that gums them up.
In a Hechinger-led panel at SXSWedu, inspired in part by education conferences past, professional communicators demonstrated ways to to speak and pitch in plain English.
The panelists were Bari Walsh, senior project manager for Usable Knowledge at the Harvard Graduate School of Education and a writer, editor, and strategic communications specialist; and Ardon Shorr, co-founder of Public Communication for Researchers, which teaches graduate students at Carnegie Mellon University — where he is a biology PhD candidate — how to explain their work and why it matters.
The panel was moderated by Hechinger higher-education editor Jon Marcus.
Listen to the conversation here.
At The Hechinger Report, we publish thoughtful letters from readers that contribute to the ongoing discussion about the education topics we cover. Please read our guidelines for more information. We will not consider letters that do not contain a full name and valid email address. You may submit news tips or ideas here without a full name, but not letters.
By submitting your name, you grant us permission to publish it with your letter. We will never publish your email address. You must fill out all fields to submit a letter.