The Hechinger Report is a national nonprofit newsroom that reports on one topic: education. Sign up for our weekly newsletters to get stories like this delivered directly to your inbox. Consider supporting our stories and becoming a member today.

A new report says the state of Mississippi does not do enough to regulate for-profit colleges.
A new report says the state of Mississippi does not do enough to regulate for-profit colleges. Credit: Terrell Clark for The Hechinger Report

Mississippi’s regulatory oversight of for-profit colleges is weak, and the state does not do enough to protect students from these sometimes predatory institutions, according to a new national report by the Children’s Advocacy Institute.

The report details the shaky background of for-profit institutions, including a history of providing inaccurate job placement rates, misleading students about job prospects, and a pattern of saddling students with immense amounts of debt. Reports by other organizations have highlighted the outsized impact such practices have on vulnerable low-income and minority students — including those in Mississippi. A 2012 report by the federal Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee found “state oversight of for-profit education companies has eroded over time due to a variety of factors, including State budget cuts and the influence of the for-profit college industry with State policymakers.”

The new report by the Children’s Advocacy Institute, part of the University of San Diego School of Law, graded each state on its oversight of for-profit institutions, examining such factors as oversight efficacy, regulation of recruiting practices, and the complaint process. Only seven states received a grade above an F. California received the top rating of a B; six states earned a D.

Mississippi received points for having a “multi-member board, commission, or panel created by statute” to oversee for-profit secondary schools and for requiring postsecondary institutions to renew their certificates of registration and gain approval from a state agency on a regular basis. However, the state was docked points because there is no state requirement for regular onsite visits by state officials to private postsecondary institutions and the state does not require increased oversight of schools when they have low graduation rates or low job placement rates.

Check out the full report and details on Mississippi’s scores here.

The Hechinger Report provides in-depth, fact-based, unbiased reporting on education that is free to all readers. But that doesn't mean it's free to produce. Our work keeps educators and the public informed about pressing issues at schools and on campuses throughout the country. We tell the whole story, even when the details are inconvenient. Help us keep doing that.

Join us today.

Letters to the Editor

At The Hechinger Report, we publish thoughtful letters from readers that contribute to the ongoing discussion about the education topics we cover. Please read our guidelines for more information. We will not consider letters that do not contain a full name and valid email address. You may submit news tips or ideas here without a full name, but not letters.

By submitting your name, you grant us permission to publish it with your letter. We will never publish your email address. You must fill out all fields to submit a letter.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *