Doug Levin

APRIL 21, 2016

FY 2003 $700,500,000. This change remained in appropriations language from FY 2007 through FY 2011. FY 2011 $100,000,000 (President Obama’s request: $0). Rationale for Obama administration FY 2011 program consolidation (i.e., Appropriations: FY 2002 $700,500,000 (President Bush’s request: $817,096,000).

Policies 150

Policies Technology Program Evaluation Education 150

EdNews Daily

JUNE 29, 2017

Mobile phones are in the hands of young people everywhere, so it is quite natural that teaching and learning opportunities are progressing towards the mobile domain. Their feedback was very encouraging and the LBMLG has been embedded in the course since then, now engaging over 1,000 students each year. “ Roger Edmonds.

Mobile Learning 0

Mobile Learning Mobility Gamification Learning 0

Educational Technology and Mobile Learning

JANUARY 4, 2023

In this study, Cooper et al analyzed a large pool of research studies on homework conducted in the United States between between 1987 and 2003. The influence is mainly noticed in students in grades 7-12 and less in students grades K-6. . Homework can drive students to develop negative attitudes towards school and learning.

Study 145

Study Elementary Analysis Mobile Learning 145

A Principal's Reflections

APRIL 15, 2018

Quite often, they’re left wondering why there was no change in student engagement or achievement after large financial investments in devices. 2003; Clark & Mayer, 2008; Mayer, 2011). The natural shift when it comes to device use by students is more active than passive learning. 2004 and McDermott et al.,

Learning 299

Learning Outcomes Technology Assessment 299